Inside buildings I get 56-58FPS, even when going apeshit with the camera
When I go outside, momentary drop to lik 30 FPS, then 40, even whn going apeshit with the cam. UNTIL I drive a car. When going around town, framedrops to 20FPS and less occur quite often.
It’s funny. Bioshock is from 2013 and GTA IV is from 2008
It’s not that weird. it is widely known that GTAIV’s PC version was rushed and horribly optimised I think there might be fanpatches/mods for it
I know that. And I am aware that my video card IS old (it was bought a few months beefore GTA IV came out), but even then it’s ridiculous. Especially taking that Max Payne 3 is working much better on high settings.
Inside buildings I get 56-58FPS, even when going apeshit with the camera
When I go outside, momentary drop to lik 30 FPS, then 40, even whn going apeshit with the cam. UNTIL I drive a car. When going around town, framedrops to 20FPS and less occur quite often.
It’s funny. Bioshock is from 2013 and GTA IV is from 2008
This has to be the BEST picture of Pewna ever! It was drawn by my friend Slots. Thank you Slots!
I’m just gonna reblog this ok
Last time, I guess.
This has to be the BEST picture of Pewna ever! It was drawn by my friend Slots. Thank you Slots!
I’m just gonna reblog this ok
No one invented it,it was dicovered* and first used in the 14 hundreds.
According to D. E. Smith, _History of Mathematics_, the sign
originated in 15th-century manuscripts aso o
per c or p cfor “per cento” or “per hundred.” By the mid-17th century it was
o
per —-
oand later the “per” was dropped. Later it was tilted into what Smith
calls the “solidus form, %”, since “/” is called a solidus.I seem to recall somewhere reading that it was originally “numero per
cento” in Italian, which was written aso /
n / cusing the solidus for “per,” as in a fraction; the c closed up to form
a second o, while the n disappeared. I can’t think what book that could be from, if not from Smith; but Smith apparently doesn’t agree.So this may just be a figment of my imagination.- Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum
Hmm, I guess that would explain it. Thak you good sir.
Tho I still say that this symbol looks stupid.



