Well, it’s just most noticeable part of the outline. Also, he’s cute ;>

And exactly why it was changed, on a thumbnail or under wrong angle (LCD screens) it practically blended into the coat.

I like this mouth better :>

This is not exactly what changed tho ;P

Reuploading due to a small change (Bonus points if you can see what it is)

Art by Slots

amwatchingyou:

ketchup-not-catsup:

I’m not even sorry

oh my GOD

dialbm:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R₁ occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R₁. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R₂ and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R₂, then the area of a round donut is πR₁² - πr₂². The area of a square donut would be then 4R₁² - 4R₂². This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R₂ = R₁/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR₁²/16 ≃ 2,94R₁², square: 15R₁²/4 = 3,75R₁²). Now, assuming a large center hole (R₂ = 3R₁/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR₁²/16 ≃ 1,37R₁², square: 7R₁²/4 = 1,75R₁²). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.

tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

I’m reblogging this again just for these comments

wankerer:

se4sons-change:

laughcentre:

just watch this please 

I CANT BREATHE

i can’t stop laughing

aetarnal:

So I heard you like the british humour

darklyspectre:

jetgreguar:

shinjigraham:

awshitthatblackgirl:

nigga-are-you-even-kawaii:

NIGGA~

this game too real

this is so beautifu l

oh my goddddddd i need this game in my life

didn’t they actually hire actual gangsters and thugs to voiceact?

raidenbutt:

Ok Japan discovering cookie clicker is seriously the best thing ever

rubbertoe17:

the Chamber of Secrets

relena-dark:

ask-nathaniel-and-nanahara:

In the words of Barry from American Dad: “YOU’RE OVERTHINKING IT!!!”

We need to test it. FOR SCIENCE!

a) Just because one of the ends is technically standing on a solid surface doesn’t mean gravity doesn’t work. Both ends will be pulled down by it so it would move as every object continunously falling through a portal.

princesspootsalot:

ponett:

these are my troublesome trucks OCs. freightershy and cargo dash

y

proffbroff:

I really don’t know what I was expecting

renoa:

ourpoeticlives:

oculousreparo:

fuckmegentlywitha2x4:

brock-obama:

Owls confirmed to be the creepiest birds ever. LOOK AT THE FUCKING THINGS. If you fail to notice the one on the left fucking SWALLOWING a rat, then you have the dude singing some satanic chant or something next to him, and then you have those two other fucking psychos synchronized to make you feel creeped the fuck out with their soulless dance of FUCKING DOOM.

I really am tempted to reblog this every time it’s on my dash. That description is one of the best things on the internet.

Yeahhhh, I want this on my blog again.

this is the post that made me sign up for tumblr

Hey, this post may contain adult content, so we’ve hidden it from public view.

Learn more.